They're both named after spectacular places and they've both risen to prominence to become two of the most recognizable outdoor brands on the planet. Columbia are known for their good quality, mid-range gear and have a huge selection, while Patagonia are renowned for their pioneering sustainability efforts and have a reputation for great quality but also high prices. So, when it comes to Patagonia vs Columbia, which one should you choose?
We asked one of our hiking gear experts to delve into the two brands, providing a detailed comparison of their origins, reputation, sustainability, products and price to help you choose between the two.
The verdict
For more budget friendly gear, Columbia may well be the go-to. However, the environmentally conscious won't think twice about spending a little more on Patagonia, a brand clearly further along on the journey towards sustainability. Patagonia's products also have a better reputation in terms of quality and durability.
At the end of the day, which brand you choose will be an entirely personal choice.
| Header Cell - Column 0 | Patagonia | Columbia |
|---|---|---|
| Origins | Founded by climber Yvon Chouinard in 1973 in California | Founded by Paul and Marie Lamfrom in 1938, who fled to the Pacific Northwest from Nazi Germany |
| Reputation | Reputation for high quality, sustainable outdoor wear; fair trade and B-Corp certified | Reptutation for good quality, mid-range gear that make use of proprietary tech, such as OutDry waterproofing |
| Environmental credentials | Renowned for its sustainability ethos and rated "good" by the Good On You watchdog | Not as strong and rated "not good enough" by the Good On You watchdog |
| Products | Products for hiking, snow sports, fly fishing and trail running; no everyday footwear; sleeping bags; backpacks; surfing gear; books; food and kitchen utensils | A wide range of products for hiking, snow sports, fly fishing, trail running, hunting, golfing; extensive footwear selection; camping gear; coolers; backpacks |
| Price | Patagonia's products are more expensive | Mid-range, though subsidiary brand Mountain Hardwear more on a par with Patagonia |
Meet the expert
Alex is a qualified Mountain Leader and the President of the London Mountaineering Club. As one of our gear experts, he's well aware of the importance of quality and sustainability, as well as affordability. He's an advocate of the idea that the best hiking gear is what you already own.
Today's best deals
Patagonia: Origins and reputation
- Patagonia was founded by climber Yvon Chouinard in 1973
- Chouinard had previously enjoyed great success selling climbing hardware
- Patagonia have a reputation for quality gear that's kind to the planet
Patagonia was founded by Yvon Chouinard who, aged 14, learned to climb as a member of the Southern California Falconry Club. He was taught, along with the other boys, how to rappel down cliffs to access the falcon aeries. After this initial tuition, he began to climb with young members from the Sierra Club, graduating to climb on the big walls of Yosemite.
In 1957, he taught himself how to blacksmith, creating climbing pitons for himself and his friends. He also started selling them to other climbers, marking the beginnings of his entrepreneurial streak. In 1965, he partnered with Tom Frost to launch Chouinard Equipment with a vision to redesign and improve almost every kind of climbing tool.
Their success meant that by the 1970s, they were the biggest supplier of climbing hardware in America, though their gear was doing damage to the environment it was being used in. Chouinard and Frost took a step back, minimizing the piton business and pivoting to aluminium chocks instead. This was the first true environmental step taken by the business.
Meanwhile, Yvon had taken to wearing rubgy shirts on a winter climbing trip to Scotland due to the protection they gave. This was an awakening in terms of the potential for a clothing business and soon he was using synthetic fibers to create high performing outdoor wear.
So, Patagonia as we know it was born in Ventura, California in 1973 and soon developed a penchant for colorful clothing that made them stand out above the humdrum and growth became rapid. What happened to the mountain hardware business? Well, Chouinard Equipment was sold off and reborn as another brand you may have heard of – Black Diamond.
Today, Patagonia have a reputation for high quality outdoor wear that is sensitive to the needs of the planet. They are also renowned for the way in which they care for their workforce and the people in their supply chain, which has led to them being Fair Trade Certified. They are also a B-Corp, which means employees, communities and the environment rank alongside shareholders in the decision-making processes.
Columbia: Origins and reputation
- Columbia was founded as a hat company by Paul and Marie Lamfrom in 1938
- They had fled to the Pacific Northwest from Nazi Germany in 1937
- The Bugaboo parka of 1986 propelled the brand to huge success
- Columbia have a reputation for good quality, mid-range gear
- The wider Columbia Sportswear umbrella also includes the brands Mountain Hardwear, Sorel, Prana and Montrail
Columbia was founded as the Columbia Hat Company in the Pacific Northwest in 1938 by Paul Lamfrom and Marie Lamfrom. The couple had fled Nazi Germany in 1937 and almost immediately set to work on their business. From small hats, great empires grow, so it seems.
The business passed to their daughter Gert Boyle who, along with her son and current CEO Tim Boyle, steered Columbia through challenging times before their fortunes improved during the 1970s. It was the Bugaboo parka of 1986 that propelled the brand to huge success and by the end of the century it had become a public company with eye-watering revenues.
Today, Columbia have a reputation for good quality, mid-range outdoor gear that makes use of a range of proprietary technologies, such as OutDry waterproofing and Omni-Heat thermally reflective fabrics. The wider Columbia Sportswear umbrella also includes the brands Mountain Hardwear, Sorel, Prana and Montrail.
Patagonia vs Columbia: environmental credentials
- Patagonia are very much renowned for their pioneering environmental work
- Most items in Patagonia's range feature recycled materials
- Columbia do not have a reputation for sustainability
- However, they state that some recycled content goes into their apparel
Patagonia are renowned for their focus on the environmental impact of everything they do, which all started back in 1970s when Yvon Chouinard recognised the negative impact his highly successful pitons were having. Throughout their history, Patagonia have campaigned for all kinds of environmental issues.
There’s plenty of environmental accreditation visible on their products, many of which are made from recycled materials, while over half of the fabrics used are certified bluesign. All Patagonia’s cotton is certified by the Global Organic Textile Standard.
Patagonia champion that fact that we should be ‘buying used, buying less and buying only what we need'. Their Worn Wear scheme enables customers to trade in their used products so that they can be resold as second-hand. The customer gets Patagonia credit and clothing stays out of landfill. A sure win-win.
Ethical consumer watchdog Good On You gives Patagonia a ‘good’ rating and the brand receive a sustainability mark of 4/5 for their planet and animals metrics, though they only score 2 for their people metric. Read the full report here.
On the other hand, Columbia’s Good On You rating is ‘not good enough’, receiving a sustainability mark of 2/5 for the planet, people and animals metrics. It says that while they use ‘some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials’ there is no evidence that they reduce their carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in most of their supply chain, nor is there any evidence that they minimize textile waste when manufacturing their products. Read the full report here.
Indeed, where Patagonia’s website screams sustainability, it’s initially difficult to find a mention of it on Columbia’s, suggesting it is not a priority of the brand, or at least not one that’s public facing.
However, the Corporate Responsibility section of Columbia’s website details their partnership with the Planet Water Foundation – a non-profit that helps combat the global water crisis – and about how their down products are sourced responsibly.
Patagonia vs Columbia: products
- Both offer a range of products that cater for hiking, snow sports, fly fishing and trail running
- Columbia offer a wider range of clothing, as well as various types of footwear and camping equipment
- Patagonia's products tend to score better in reviews and are generally thought of as higher in terms of quality
Both offer a similar range of products, with jackets, shirts, base layers, pants, underwear for adults and kids, as well as backpacks and duffel bags. They both have a range of products to cater for hiking, snow sports, fly fishing and trail running.
Columbia’s offer more varieties of each kind of product, as well as selling a wide range of footwear, including hiking shoes and boots, sneakers, trail runners, fishing shoes and sandals.
By contrast, Patagonia do not make everyday footwear, though they do sell work boots, wading boots and surf booties. Columbia also sell apparel for golfers, hunting gear and sell a range of camping equipment too, including tents, sleeping bags and even cool boxes.
Patagonia sell several varieties of sleeping bag but their camping equipment offering beyond this is limited to only a few products. One market they operate in that Columbia don't is surfing, with a range of wetsuits and board shorts. Away from clothing and equipment, Patagonia also publish books, while their Patagonia Provisions business sells responsibly sourced food and various kitchen utensils.
In terms of performance, Patagonia’s products tend to have the better reputation among outdoor professionals and enthusiasts. Their apparel generally scores higher in reviews, frequently appearing in ‘best of’ lists and the like, making them one of the most sought-after brands for performance in the backcountry. You are much more likely to see Columbia-owned Mountain Hardwear products vying with Patagonia’s in tests than branded Columbia gear.
Patagonia vs Columbia: price
- Patagonia's gear is more expensive than Columbia's
- Columbia's premium subsidiary Mountain Hardwear is on a par with Patagonia in terms of price
There’s no doubt that, price wise, Patagonia are a more premium brand than Columbia, who moved away from top line products in the early 2010s. There are many reasons why Patagonia gear is expensive, including their sustainability drive and the quality of the materials and components. However, it’s worth bearing in mind that Mountain Hardwear, who craft high performance gear at a similar price point to Patagonia, is owned by Columbia. However, for the purposes of this feature, we are focussing solely on Columbia vs Patagonia.
As an example, a typical Columbia down jacket or puffer costs between $100 and $240 dollars, whereas you can expect a Patagonia jacket to set you back between $180 and $500. Their most expensive down jackets are Columbia’s Barrett Spur at $600 and Patagonia’s Frozen Range 3-in-1 Parka at $850.
A quick glance at their waterproof jackets confirms the trend, with a Columbia rain jacket typically costing between $50 and $200, whereas a Patagonia hard shell has a price tag of between $180 and $400.
